Se dice que el sistema es un paso adelante en el sistema japonés de administración de justicia y con él, el país estará en el mismo nivel que otros países del G8.
Sin embargo, a pesar de numerosos intentos del Ministerio de Justicia para familiarizar a las personas con el sistema (a través de videos gratuitos disponibles en las tiendas de alquiler de videos o por medio de caricaturas como esta [jp]), la mayoría de ciudadanos japoneses parecen estar perplejos y bastante inquietos sobre las consecuencias que pueda traer un juez lego, como informó una reciente encuesta de CNET Japan.
La encuesta muestra que 65.1% de los encuestados (361 personas de entre 30 y 40 años) se declararon en contra de la participación de ciudadanos comunes en el proceso de juzgamiento. Se han dado múltiples razones pero las principales fueron ‘no me gusta juzgar a otros’ (52.8%), ‘no quiero tener problemas’ (44.3%) y ‘no confío en mi juicio’ (43.8%).
=================================================================
Before introduction of the lay judge system, which entails six citizens sitting with three professional judges to try serious criminal trials, Japan was the only Group of Eight nation whose public did not participate in criminal trials, according to the Japan Federation of Bar Associations. Japan had a jury system between 1928 and 1943, but only on a limited basis.
Many people remain reluctant to participate in the new system, in which they will have to reach verdicts and hand down sentences, including the death penalty, opinion polls show.
Fujii's trial is scheduled to last three days, followed by closed-door deliberations by the lay and professional judges, who are to decide the verdict based on evidence, and the possible sentence.
The verdict must be decided by a conditional majority vote where at least one professional judge must be included in the majority decision.
The law sets a maximum ¥100,000 fine for people who fail to show up to be a lay judge candidate on the designated date "without due reasons."
The candidates were given an orientation session. After a DVD presentation explaining what they were expected to do as lay judges, the candidates were briefed on the case by a court official and were asked to respond to a questionnaire asking whether they knew the defendant, the victim or their families, or if any serious hardship prevented them from serving.
0 comentarios:
Post a Comment